Sun Tzuâs âThe Art of WarâÂ is cited by most as one of the worldâs most reputable resources on Military Strategy. In reality, there are endless contemporary thinkers that make their concepts of Business Strategy descend directly from Sun Tzuâs well-known work. As I recently wrote myÂ overview of Strategy Frameworks, I resisted for some time the urge to also include Sun Tzuâs work into that article. But I have now come to the conclusion that it is probably digging a bit deeper into those ancient concepts.
When talking about a Strategic Plan in the first chapter of the book, Sun Tzu mentions that there are Five Fundamental Factors to be considered and seven elements that will deliver the outcome. Altogether, they provide an excellent framework also to map todayâs business and help devise an organisationâs Strategy.
The Art of WarÂ is traditionally attributed to a military general from the late 6th century BC known as âMaster Sunâ (Mandarin: âSunziâ, earlier âSun Tzuâ). However, the dating of some of its parts is doubted. There have been several historical sources and commentaries for the text that we today consider trulyÂ The Art of War.
It is constituted of 13 chapters, which address the general definition of a strategy, up to the usage of tactics such as spies. Read by generals, business people, sports coaches and strategists, the book has a widespread influence, especially for the first couple of chapters. It still is a book about war, and this is probably one of its limits, especially when considering that one of the messages that many holds out of reading it is thatÂ victory is based on deception. Seeing Strategy as an opposition of forces and a battle is an issue as we have seen. However, the book itself still treasures some general principles we should consider.
Hence the saying: If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.Sun Tzu, The Art of War
TranslationsÂ vary a lot about how these five factors are represented in modern English, and some authors have been tweaking the meanings of some of these a bit too much. However, the five factors, all in all, allow representing aÂ full map of the current scenarioÂ to be considered. And they can be easily used to create a comprehensiveÂ Business Analysis Framework. Letâs see them together.
The Five Elements can be arranged into a visual that displays them into a circle. There is not a definite prevalence of one onto the other elements; they all influence each other. In the past, there has been an entire discussion on the disposition and representation ofÂ these elements.
The main reason why this framework is useful for Strategic Analysis is straightforward: typically, as we have seen, Strategy Definitions have been aligned on loosely defining the objectives (although we have already seen this is not the aim of Strategy), andÂ then often move directly into the Plan. A few frameworks (like PESTLE) have been looking at theÂ Topography. But few offer a genuinely full map of what is existing.
A typical example is that of what is defined as âSystemsâ is often overlooked and assumed as a consequence of a Strategy Definition, rather than an element to be contemplated when the Strategy is described. All of these elements influence the Strategy and can be affected by the Strategy itself (with the sole exception of the Meteorology). The Value of Sun Tzuâs Five Factors lies here: using a circular mindset, typical of the Oriental culture and Taoism, as opposed to the linear way of thinking we have in the west.
The one overarching element of this framework is that it is based on a profound knowledge of the environment, the external forces that shape it, the competition but also your internal organisation. As in the quote mentioned above, not knowing yourself is probably the biggest problem in defining a Strategy.
Moreover, this framework can help in shaping what we have seen, defined asÂ Strategy as Learning. Imagine building a system where all these elements are not just an occasionally analysed when the Strategy is set, but preferably continuously, focusing on picking up the weak signals and early warnings of the changing environment. It can become the focus of a continuous movement of learning and adaptation.
After describing the five factors, Sun Tzu presents seven considerations that should be made (and suggests doing so âby comparisonâ, de-facto being probably the first suggesting Benchmarks as a way of analysis).
Again, the idea of the Strategy defined as a mere battle between two opponents is not what we should consider in a business context. But itâs interesting to notice that these considerations can guide reasoning also today. (1) Who in the market has the most robust Purpose and better alignment? (2) Where is Leadership better displayed? (3) Who has the better capability of exploiting current forces in the environment? (4) Who has the best Operating Model in place? (5) Who has the best financial strength (6) Where are the best skills available? And whatâs the training model? (7) Where is there better consistency in rewards and incentives?
What comes immediately to mind is that these are not traditional questions for the definition of a strategy. We tend to look too much at the financials, not at the organisation capabilities.
This is where probably the pure modernity of this approach comes through: its focus on theÂ skillsÂ of the actors involved in the environment.
It may seem weird to resort to a model that is more than two millennia old. However, with so many people continually referring to it, I thought it would be good to consider it and check what value this could have in a modern perspective. By moving away from the idea of a âbattleâ, I do think that Sun TzuâsÂ The Art of WarÂ offers to valuable lessons that any modern strategist needs to consider:
As we consider more and more our companies asÂ living organisationsÂ within anÂ ecosystemÂ (one of the primary Purpose of the visual guide that I presented as Organisation Evolution Framework), I think this tie with the ancient past can be beneficial for our understanding, especially in a VUCA environment where constant learning is key.
What do you think?
https://youtu.be/O8aDOR2Po50 In this tenth video of the series Leaders for Humanity, hosts Antoinette Weibel and… Read More
https://youtu.be/WZIv-PS7Vo8 In this eighth video of the series Leaders for Humanity, hosts Antoinette Weibel and… Read More
https://youtu.be/r5GfGeiryPc In this seventh video of the series Leaders for Humanity, hosts Antoinette Weibel and… Read More
https://youtu.be/5-qE_WhZ2OE In this sixth video of the series Leaders for Humanity, hosts Antoinette Weibel and… Read More
https://youtu.be/TywLA6p0vjg In this fifth video of the series Leaders for Humanity, hosts Antoinette Weibel and… Read More
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6ADNHtY6jc I've recently had the pleasure of speaking about The Intentional Organisation with Carlo Marchesi,… Read More