Models: Tuckman's Stages of Group Development
Bruce Tuckman published his “Forming Storming Norming Performing” model in 1965. He added a fifth stage, Adjourning, in 1977. The Stages of Team Development Theory is an elegant and helpful explanation of team development and behaviour. Similarities can be seen with other models, such as Tannenbaum and Schmidt Continuum and especially with Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership model, developed about the same time.
The model is relevant in any Organisational Design effort.
Tuckman’s model explains that as the team develops maturity and ability, relationships establish, and the leader changes leadership style. Beginning with a directing style, moving through coaching, then participating, finishing delegating and almost detached. At this point, the team may produce a successor leader and the previous leader can move on to develop a new team.
The original article identified four Stages of Team Development:
To which later on another one was added
As a team leader, your aim is to help your people perform well, as quickly as possible. To do this, you’ll need to make sure you are able to understand at which stage your team is and adapt your leadership style accordingly.
Stage | Activities | Skills Involved |
---|---|---|
1. Forming | Select the Team Members and Direct the Team. Organize Workshops and establish the team’s purpose. Establish Goals and ways of measurement. | Curiosity Listening |
2. Storming | – Establish Process and Structures. – Use Transparency and Authenticity to cement the culture – Resolve conflict as they occurr Continue to be positive. | Authenticity Resilience |
3. Norming | – Step back, and help the team take responsibility – Review Purpose – This is a good moment for Team Building | Decision Making Be Deliberately Developmental Systems Thinking |
4. Performing | Ensure Delegation is consistently used | Learning Agility |
5. Adjourning | Celebrate the achievements Point out the learnings |
Below the original article. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399.
c763010e6eb856250b939e4eec438e14ef8fThe image used in this post is available as a large format poster on Scott M. Graffius website.
Despite being dated, from experience I still find Tuckman’s Model to be very solid and relevant, and useful for any Manager, Human Resource Professional and Facilitator. One of the biggest critiques to the model is that it sometimes is too simplified when presented in a linear way.
Figure 2 presents an alternative way of representing the model, which specifically adapts to Aile teams for example.
And you? What do you think of this model? Write your comments below.
Cover Photo by Pascal Swier on Unsplash
https://youtu.be/O8aDOR2Po50 In this tenth video of the series Leaders for Humanity, hosts Antoinette Weibel and… Read More
https://youtu.be/WZIv-PS7Vo8 In this eighth video of the series Leaders for Humanity, hosts Antoinette Weibel and… Read More
https://youtu.be/r5GfGeiryPc In this seventh video of the series Leaders for Humanity, hosts Antoinette Weibel and… Read More
https://youtu.be/5-qE_WhZ2OE In this sixth video of the series Leaders for Humanity, hosts Antoinette Weibel and… Read More
https://youtu.be/TywLA6p0vjg In this fifth video of the series Leaders for Humanity, hosts Antoinette Weibel and… Read More
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6ADNHtY6jc I've recently had the pleasure of speaking about The Intentional Organisation with Carlo Marchesi,… Read More
View Comments